Check out the Daily Take
I'll still use this blog every once in a while when I really feel like writing on a topic, but for a daily look at the world, check out the new blog.
Zack
Living the dream
This past Sunday, Lance Armstrong rolled down the Champs-Elysee, sipping on gin and juice (or at least a little champagne), and holding up 7 fingers to signify his 7 straight Tour de France wins. Lance was living strong. Another 2,000+ miles through the Alps were done; another Tour finished while wearing yellow. At the end of Lance’s last bike race ever, a few things are certain:
I’ve written before about the superlative epidemic that exists in the media nowadays. I guess I need to amend my thesis a bit. Our hyperbolic nature makes us crave extremes. With every sports draft we try and figure out who will be the next superstar. We long for another Michael Jordan – as if the first (and only) wasn’t enough. And the theory pervades in all areas of life – what’s the best car, the finest hotel, the next Big Thing. We are suckers for potential (Tech bubble anyone?), and we want to rank everything. The funny thing is, after a thing, or person, or company has run its course, our retrospective lenses are far more critical, unwilling to admit that what is so recent really could be that good. I guess it goes back to our “Good ol’ Days” gene – the one that makes us think that everything was somehow better long ago.
So even before Lance stepped off the podium in Paris, sportswriters and talking heads around the globe were chomping at the bit to find Armstrong’s rightful place on the list of “greatest athletes of all time.” The conventional argument is that Armstrong isn’t the greatest because a) he rides a bike b) he might not even be the best cyclist of all time (Eddie Mercx) and c) he couldn’t play any other sports well.
I can’t speak much for arguments a) and b), as my cycling knowledge extends only to the names of the great Tour de France champions of the past. But in thinking about argument c), especially Skip Bayless’ version, I have to disagree with the logic.
Bayless’ contention is that in order to be a great athlete on his list, you would have to have the ability to play all sports well (or, if not all sports, you get bonus points for being able to play wo or more sports well at a high level). It’s the idea that if you grew a bunch of people from early childhood and reared them to only play sports, teaching the various fundamentals to all games from an early age, the best overall at all sports would be the best athlete. Bayless thus says that Bo Jackson and Deion Sanders are better athletes than Michael Jordan because they were able to play football and baseball at the highest levels, while Jordan faded into baseball oblivion.
Bo Jackson and Deion Sanders were freaks. And if you tested their skill sets (speed, quickness, agility, strength), they may have tested out as better “athletes” on paper than Michael Jordan. But the point of athleticism is to apply your physical (and I would contend, mental) skills to a game or sport, in competition with others. And if we look at athlete like that, there is no question in anyone’s mind that Jordan is far and away a better athlete than Bo, Deion, and 99.9% of everyone that has ever lived.
Who’s smarter – the guy with the 140 IQ who writes the algorithm behind Google, or the one with a 145 IQ who sits in a basement and figures out ways to bomb government buildings. On paper, the terrorist is smarter. But it’s application that matters, and I think credit has to be given to individuals who realize what they’re good at, have amazing ablility, and go with it.
Lance Armstrong won seven straight Tour de France titles against the best cyclists from around the world. Even if you take out the doping allegations, the battle with cancer, and the pressure of being number 1, taking the title 7 straight times is unbelievable. To win the Tour, one must be able to sprint with the sprinters, climb with the climbers, and survive until the end. Lance can do all 3, and when it mattered, he was the best at all 3. No one else was even close.
Cycling purists will claim that Lance’s victories are tainted somehow by the fact that he trains the whole year for this one race, while other cyclists ride numerous smaller, more forgiving courses on the racing circuit. Does it matter? If Lance went out and won 30 more races against watered down fields, would he be any better than he is today? Does anyone care that the Patriots lost to the Dolphins last year? Or that UNC lost to Santa Clara? No. Because champions are those who are able to defy all others to win the biggest prize, the one that everyone wants. And Lance is the ultimate racing champion.
I’m not saying that Lance Armstrong is the best athlete of all time. In fact, I’m pretty sure he isn’t. What I’m saying is give the man his due. He deserves it.
So this is my 3rd attempt today to update the blog. On the first try, I started writing and got about a paragraph in before I realized that what I was writing was absolutely and unequivocally crap. So I deleted it, ran three laps around the office screaming "my blog is crap", poured hot coffee on my head, and ate a rank cucumber I found in the office fridge (well, maybe all of that isn't true).
So then came try number 2 - I managed to come up with 2 or 3 original thoughts, felt good about the overall piece, and clicked on the "Publish" button. I was greeted by the evil "This page cannot be displayed" page. The horror didn't hit me until a second later when I went back and realized that a) my blog hadn't updated and b) my work was lost.
At this point I decided a few things :
But the fact that the blog messed up ends up being a perfect segue into what I really wanted to put out there for you. I've been thinking a lot lately about just how much the world has changed in the past 5 years. Does it really seem like a little over 5 years ago that we were all worried about Y2K and people were stocking up on bottled water and non-perishables while worrying worse than Humpty Dumpty? And if you try and think back to what the world was like 10, 15, 20 years ago - can you even remember. Try and remember, if you will, when:
What I'm saying is that the world is changing, and changing fast. I have absolutely no idea where it's going next, but trying to think about it is fun, exciting, scary, mind-boggling, intense - all at the same time. I was going to go into more detail, but Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban beat me to the punch with a blog entry of his own. In his eyes, people who long for "the good ol' days" simply don't remember what those days were like. It's an interesting take.
If you feel like clicking on the link to see Cuban's take, I highly recommend it - it's good. Let me also say that 99% of the time I think that Mark Cuban is a cocky-pompous-showboating-looking for the spotlight punk who happened to be in the right place at the right time to ride the technology bubble all the way to billions of dollars. (In actuality, Cuban is probably a really smart dude, I just can't stand the way he acts sometimes). Anyway, this is one of that 1% when I think he's got some good points...so enjoy.
Zack
It’s the end of the week, so I thought it would be appropriate to share a few links – stories, articles, and facts that I’ve found interesting in the past week. Some you’ve probably seen, some your probably haven’t. Enjoy.
As I post the first link, I am reminded of one year ago, when I was living in an apartment full of recent college grads with no jobs, little hope on the horizon, and an insatiable appetite for Halo. Maybe it's a good thing I didn't know about www.despair.com back then.
I’ve never been to
I don’t know what’s more interesting about this article: That Freddy Adu makes $550,000 a year before endorsements or that I actually get paid more than a good number of real-life professional athletes in
If you feel like 2005 has been dragging along, there’s a reason why. The International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service in
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Raymond Felton = My Favorite Player. EVER. (And Sean May isn’t bad either.) Click here to link to the boys Meet the Press comments.